
Take Care of the Women!
1981

1950
Director
Ivan Pyryev
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In the steppes of the Kuban love is born on two collective farms while wheat is (enthusiastically) gathered. Galina, the energetic chairwoman of one of the two kolkhozes, vies with her male counterpart for the best harvest. At the same time Gordey, her rival, a former soldier, is (and has been for ages) in love with her. On her part, Dasha a collective farm worker, has heartbeat for a young technician of the competing kolkhoz...
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to strict heteronormative structures. Romantic competition between male and female leads drives the plot, with no presence of non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Women hold significant professional agency, such as Galina's leadership as a kolkhoz chairwoman. However, the narrative balances this with traditional romantic tropes and subplots.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Casting is ethnically homogeneous, reflecting the specific Slavic and Cossack demographics of the Kuban region. It presents a localized identity as the universal standard.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film celebrates the transition to collective ownership and communalism. It prioritizes state-aligned social morality over religious institutions and individualist capitalism.
Disability Representation
Characters are presented as idealized, able-bodied archetypes of the Soviet working class. There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Ivan Pyryev’s film is a celebratory musical that prioritizes ideological and communal values over individual identity. It excels in its cultural depiction of socialist progress, framing the shift from private property to collective farming as a moral triumph. This provides a robust, if highly specific, look at the era's social morality. However, the film remains socially conservative in its interpersonal dynamics. While women occupy leadership roles, they are still tethered to traditional romantic arcs. The lack of ethnic or identity-based diversity keeps the scope narrow, focusing entirely on a specific regional demographic. Ultimately, the work functions as a utopian vision of state-aligned life. It subverts Western economic norms but maintains a rigid, traditional framework regarding gender and sexuality.

1981

1936
1940

1948

1947

1962

1941

1939
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.