Faraway, So Close!
1993
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Wings of Desire
1987
PG-13Director
Wim Wenders
Runtime
128 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Two angels, Damiel and Cassiel, glide through the streets of Berlin, observing the bustling population, providing invisible rays of hope to the distressed but never interacting with them. When Damiel falls in love with lonely trapeze artist Marion, the angel longs to experience life in the physical world, and finds — with some words of wisdom from actor Peter Falk — that it might be possible for him to take human form.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
5.8/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a heteronormative romantic arc between an angel and a human trapeze artist. It does not center on queer identities or non-cisnormative structures.
Gender Representation
Female characters possess significant emotional agency and act as catalysts for the protagonist's transformation. The film subverts rigid masculine archetypes by prioritizing vulnerability over detached strength.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast reflects the demographic realities of 1980s Europe. It presents a mosaic of socioeconomic backgrounds rather than focusing on specific racialized conflicts.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
Wenders reimagines angels as empathetic observers rather than agents of divine authority. This deconstructs traditional religious hierarchies in favor of a secular, existentialist inquiry.
Disability Representation
The film uses the angels' inability to touch or feel as a metaphor for sensory deprivation. This explores a state of existential disability and liminality.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional religious hierarchies by portraying angels as empathetic, non-judgmental observers.
- Challenges masculine archetypes by centering the narrative on vulnerability and sensory connection.
- Provides a sophisticated critique of geopolitical structures through its portrayal of a divided city.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative romantic structures.
- Does not focus on specific physical or neurodivergent disabilities, relying instead on metaphysical metaphors.
- The demographic focus remains largely centered on the realities of late-1980s Europe.
AI Analysis
Wim Wenders' masterpiece excels at subverting institutional authority and traditional divinity. By reimagining angels as empathetic observers, the film moves away from rigid moral hierarchies toward a more secular, humanistic perspective. While the film lacks overt demographic diversity or explicit LGBTQ+ themes, it finds depth in the 'existential disability' of its celestial protagonists. The narrative uses their sensory deprivation to explore the profound beauty of the mundane human experience. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ability to challenge traditional gender roles and religious structures, offering a nuanced meditation on connection within a fragmented urban landscape.
Similar Movies
Bird People
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
The Future
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Fly Me to Polaris
1999
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
Don't Die Without Telling Me Where You're Going
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
Song of Love
1972
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 7.8 out of 10
Heaven's Postman
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.9 out of 10
The Strange Case of Angelica
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Njan Gandharvan
1991
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Bear's Kiss
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.4 out of 10
The Fairy
2011
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
Out of the Ordinary
2014
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.