You are here:
Hold-Up

Hold-Up

2020

Runtime

169 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

With his documentary "Hold-Up", director Pierre Barnérias denounces the lies, corruption and manipulation in France around the management of covid-19.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The documentary focuses on the COVID-19 pandemic and institutional corruption. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives exploring non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film centers on political and medical decision-making. It lacks significant evidence regarding the subversion of gender hierarchies or the portrayal of specific gendered archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The scope is localized to the French political and medical landscape. The documentary does not utilize diverse casting or racial metaphors as central narrative devices.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film challenges traditional Western institutions by framing the government as a source of manipulation. It disrupts conventional trust in state authority and centralized power.

Disability Representation

Limited

While the film addresses a global health crisis, it lacks characters with disabilities portrayed with agency. The focus remains on systemic responses rather than individual disability narratives.

Strengths

  • Strongly challenges the integrity of Western political and medical institutions.
  • Provides a focused critique of systemic power and state-sanctioned narratives.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+, racial, or gendered identities.
  • Fails to include characters with disabilities portrayed with agency or depth.

AI Analysis

Hold-Up functions primarily as an investigative critique of state power and institutional integrity. Its narrative architecture is built around deconstructing official narratives regarding the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Because the film prioritizes systemic skepticism over identity politics, it lacks meaningful representation across most demographic categories. It does not explore intersectional identities, focusing instead on the corruption and manipulation within political and medical establishments. While the film scores low on traditional diversity metrics, it achieves a high score in cultural representation by actively challenging the reliability of Western institutional structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.