You are here:

Addiction: A 60's Love Story

Addiction: A 60's Love Story

Representation Score

4.9/10

Fair

2015

Director

Tate Steinsiek

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Addiction: A 60's Love Story operates as a conventional period crime thriller. The narrative architecture prioritizes the psychological collapse of a singular male protagonist within a traditional domestic framework. While the film examines the fragility of social institutions and the underground economy of 1968, it lacks complexity in reflecting multiple aspects of identity. The storytelling follows established genre clichés rather than challenging identity hierarchies. Ultimately, the film focuses on individual struggle and the dissolution of a well-crafted reality, offering a character study that remains within a narrow, traditional demographic lens.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Addiction: A 60's Love Story have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The story centers on a family structure that assumes everyone is straight and cisgender. There is no evidence of characters with diverse gender identities or critiques of these assumptions.

How does Addiction: A 60's Love Story portray gender?

Fair

The film relies on traditional gender roles, focusing on the 'family man' archetype. It explores family dissolution through a male protagonist's struggle rather than elevating women's roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Addiction: A 60's Love Story?

Limited

Set in 1968 New York, the film involves organized crime clichés. However, the focus remains on a specific family unit without indicating a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon cast.

How does Addiction: A 60's Love Story represent religion and culture?

Fair

The narrative critiques the stability of traditional Western institutions like the nuclear family. It functions primarily as a character study of personal and social collapse.

Does Addiction: A 60's Love Story include disability representation?

Limited

Addiction is a central theme, serving as a depiction of chronic dependency. It often acts as a plot device to drive tension rather than exploring nuanced experiences of disability.

Present on Screen

  • Engages with the deconstruction of traditional Western institutions like the nuclear family.
  • Provides a period-accurate exploration of the 1968 New York underground and organized crime.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks complexity in reflecting multiple aspects of identity or intentionally challenging established identity hierarchies.
  • Relies on traditional gender roles and archetypes rather than exploring diverse perspectives or elevating women's roles.
  • Uses addiction primarily as a plot device for tension rather than a nuanced study of disability.

Official Synopsis

Family man Max Bornstein was a full-time dope fiend working within the underground, highly illegal pornography industry in 1968’s New York City. While running books and films to delivery points and mob headquarters around the east coast, Max had the Feds on his tail. But even in the wake of a federal investigation, his truest worry was his wife and two young children, a family kept in the dark about his dealings and the walls of it caving in around him. As he battles his consuming addiction, dissolving family unit and the growing suspicion about his drug use amongst his associates, Max watches helplessly as his well-crafted reality falls to pieces, leaving him searching for the spaces in between.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.