
El diario de una prostituta 2
2017

1967
Director
John Amero, Lem Amero
Runtime
73 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Presented as an inquiry into the ways of lust, this film is staged as a documentary. It moves from rural prostitution (the roadhouse) to pornographers, then on to streetwalkers, male hustlers, and high-class call girls. The madam runs the bordello, she depends on the photographer to supply her with pornography; he's in the city, using his camera to lead him into depravity. The streetwalkers risk arrest from the cops and abuse from the johns. Even the call girls have a tough time: from their expenses to their lack of self-reflection. Their motto: "Live fast, die young, and make a beautiful corpse."
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film includes male hustlers, which moves away from traditional domestic tropes. However, it lacks explicit narratives regarding non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Women occupy central roles, such as the madam managing a bordello. While this disrupts traditional hierarchies, the focus on streetwalkers and call girls risks relying on victimhood tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
There is no evidence of non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon casting. The documentation provides no indicators of racial blending or intersectional representation within the urban or rural settings.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film adopts a secular, nihilistic worldview that challenges conventional Western morality. It prioritizes a non-judgmental inquiry into lust over traditional religious or family structures.
Disability Representation
The narrative contains no evidence of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Lusting Hours functions as a subversion of mid-century social decorum rather than a structured advancement of identity politics. It succeeds in centering marginalized social roles, such as sex workers, and challenges the era's rigid moral frameworks through a documentary-style lens. However, the film lacks significant intersectional depth. The absence of racial diversity and the lack of explicit LGBTQ+ identity politics prevent it from achieving a more progressive rating. It explores the mechanics of eroticism without necessarily deconstructing the social hierarchies behind them.

2017

1969

1972

1979

2012

1970

1971

1983

2010

1971

1981

1965
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.