
In Memorium
2005

2017
Director
Nigel Bach
Runtime
85 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Jaquie, a psychic, Schmiddy, a dyslexic cameraman, and Dave, apparently producer/financier, descend upon Tom Riley's abandoned house to learn what happened using all of their special skills. After breaking into the house and retrieving a camera to read the sim card, on return, Tom emerges from the woods, where he has been living in a tent since being dragged down the stairs and thru the basement at the end of the first episode.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any visible LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing queer identity. There is no evidence of same-sex intimacy or non-cisnormative gender identities within the story.
Gender Representation
Jaquie provides a female perspective through her psychic abilities, offering a break from male-only ensembles. However, men still hold the primary technical and financial roles in the group.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Specific racial or ethnic identities are not established in the narrative. While character names vary, the text provides no details regarding the cast's racial backgrounds.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot relies on standard horror tropes rather than exploring specific cultural or religious themes. It focuses on individual utility within a genre-typical investigation framework.
Disability Representation
Schmiddy is explicitly identified as dyslexic, providing a layer of neurodivergent representation. He functions as a productive member of the investigative team rather than a caricature.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Badder Ben: The Final Chapter operates primarily as a conventional horror piece. Its diversity is driven almost entirely by the inclusion of a neurodivergent character, Schmiddy, who is identified as dyslexic. This provides a rare moment of functional disability representation within the ensemble. Beyond this, the film adheres to traditional genre structures. While Jaquie introduces a female presence with specialized skills, the distribution of agency and technical roles remains largely conventional. The narrative lacks engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or explicit racial and cultural explorations. Ultimately, the film does not attempt to subvert social hierarchies or provide systemic critiques. It functions as a standard genre exercise where character traits serve the plot rather than broader social commentary.

2005

2018

2008

1981

2014

2016

2016

2013

2010

2011

2017

2012
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.