Yes-People
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.1 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Fat Feet
1966
Director
Mimi Gross, Red Grooms, Yvonne Andersen, Dominic Falcone
Runtime
19 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
"Fat Feet", eight months in production, is a pop-art view of life in the big city, complete with a fire-fighting episode and various street scenes. Three dimensional figures and real actors were shot by Grooms both on location and within sets.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.8/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks explicit evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. Its pop-art style focuses more on urban movement than character-driven romantic subplots.
Gender Representation
The production features notable female directorial involvement, disrupting the male-dominated animation hierarchies of the 1960s. This leadership profile suggests a subversion of conventional industry norms.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Urban street scenes and location shooting suggest a potentially heterogeneous environment. However, the specific racial composition of the cast remains unconfirmed.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative prioritizes the chaotic, lived experience of the city over idealized or moralistic storytelling. This secular, observational approach aligns with a modern, pop-art aesthetic.
Disability Representation
There is no documented evidence regarding the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
Strengths
- Features a progressive directorial team with significant female leadership in a male-dominated era.
- Utilizes urban realism and street scenes that suggest a more heterogeneous environment than standard animation.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks explicit representation or narrative focus on LGBTQ+ identities.
- Provides no documented evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
- Fails to provide specific details regarding the racial composition of the cast.
AI Analysis
Fat Feet stands out primarily for its structural progressiveness rather than explicit character-driven diversity. By placing women in directorial roles during the mid-1960s, the film challenges the era's traditional animation hierarchies. While the urban, pop-art setting implies a realistic and potentially diverse city life, the film lacks specific narrative details regarding racial, religious, or LGBTQ+ identities. The focus remains on aesthetic movement and street scenes. Ultimately, the work is a stylistic departure from studio-bound animation, though it lacks the intersectional depth required for a higher diversity rating.
Similar Movies
Early Bird
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Pink Blueprint
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
General Chaos: Uncensored Animation
1998
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
The Ghost Monster
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
The Frog
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Benny's Bathtub
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.3 out of 10
Storytime
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.6 out of 10
The Unshrinkable Jerry Mouse
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
The 2000 Year Old Man
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.8 out of 10
The Nine Lives of Fritz the Cat
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.8 out of 10
I'm Just Wild About Jerry
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.