You are here:

I... for Icarus

I... for Icarus

Representation Score

2.3/10

Limited

1979

Director

Henri Verneuil

Runtime

129 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

For Icarus is a classic political thriller that prioritizes the deconstruction of institutional authority over demographic representation. The film focuses on the tension between individual conscience and state power, making it a study of systemic corruption. While the film excels in its critique of capitalist media and state infallibility, it remains rooted in the era-specific conventions of 1970s cinema. This results in a narrative structure that is heavily male-centric and Western-led. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual skepticism of power structures, even though it lacks modern diversity and depth in character development.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does I... for Icarus have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film follows traditional structures that assume everyone is straight or cisgender. There are no depictions of same-sex relationships or non-binary identities.

How does I... for Icarus portray gender?

Limited

Professional authority is mainly held by male characters. Women play supporting roles and do not lead the main investigation.

How racially and ethnically diverse is I... for Icarus?

Fair

The film includes actors from various backgrounds but is primarily driven by Western characters. Non-Western settings serve as backdrops rather than centers of action.

How does I... for Icarus represent religion and culture?

Good

The story provides a nuanced look at institutional power and media manipulation. It portrays truth as a contested space against state-approved versions.

Does I... for Icarus include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant depiction of visible or invisible disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated exploration of the deconstruction of institutional and state power.
  • Compelling critique of how media conglomerates manipulate truth for political gain.
  • Thoughtful examination of the tension between individual conscience and systemic corruption.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of gender diversity, with professional authority concentrated in male characters.
  • Minimal representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth gender expressions.
  • Limited ability to act for non-Western characters in international political landscapes.

Official Synopsis

Following the assassination of President Marc Jarry, a member of the investigation committee refuses to sign off on the committee's final findings.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.