You are here:

Cured

Cured

Representation Score

9.5/10

Excellent

2020

Director

Patrick Sammon, Bennett Singer

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Cured is a highly intentional work of historical revisionism that shifts the perspective from institutional authority to the ability to act of underrepresented people. It successfully disrupts conventional medical histories by centering the voices of those who fought against systemic oppression. The film excels in its portrayal of LGBTQ+ activists as agents of change rather than passive subjects of medical scrutiny. By reframing the fight for equality as a battle against pathologization, it provides a powerful look at the struggle for psychological autonomy. While the film is strong in its cultural and identity-based critiques, it offers less specific detail regarding racial diversity. This limits its impact in the racial and ethnic category despite its overall progressive framework.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Cured have LGBTQ+ representation?

Excellent

The film focuses on LGBTQ+ activists who challenged the psychiatric establishment, highlighting their role in fighting against the pathologization of queer identities by medical institutions.

How does Cured portray gender?

Good

The narrative emphasizes the multi-layered struggles of women within mid-20th-century activist movements, showcasing their central roles in shaping social change and political resistance.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Cured?

Good

The documentary acknowledges the systemic barriers faced by various groups during the era of activism. However, it lacks specific detail about the breadth of racial diversity within the featured groups.

How does Cured represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques Western medical and psychiatric institutions as tools of systemic oppression, prioritizing the liberation of identity over the preservation of traditional societal structures.

Does Cured include disability representation?

Excellent

The documentary examines how psychiatry used 'mental illness' labels to marginalize specific demographics, reframing the struggle for autonomy against the power dynamics of defining normalcy.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of medical institutions that enforced social conformity.
  • Centers LGBTQ+ activists as key figures in challenging systemic oppression.
  • Offers a nuanced examination of how medicalization intersects with disability and autonomy.

Limited or Absent

  • Provides limited specific data regarding the breadth of racial diversity within the activist groups.
  • The primary lens remains focused on sexual orientation, which may overshadow other multi-layered identities.

Official Synopsis

Mentally ill. Deviant. Diseased. And in need of a cure. These were among the terms psychiatrists used to describe gay women and men in the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s. And as long as they were “sick”, progress toward equality was impossible. This documentary chronicles the battle waged by a small group of activists who declared war against a formidable institution – and won a crucial victory in the modern movement for LGBTQIA+ equality.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.