You are here:

Mariupolis 2

Mariupolis 2

Representation Score

8.8/10

Excellent

2022

Director

Mantas Kvedaravičius

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mariupolis 2 stands as a significant piece of ethnographic cinema that disrupts conventional media consumption. Its primary strength lies in its commitment to the ability to act of its subjects, prioritizing localized human experiences over macro-political narratives. The film succeeds by challenging traditional institutional power and bypassing the filtered lenses of globalist media. This approach allows for a more authentic, non-performative representation of the people living through the tragedy in Ukraine. However, the documentary's focus on the immediate realities of war means that specific narrative arcs for certain identities, such as LGBTQ+ or neurodivergent individuals, remain unverified within the broader ethnographic scope.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Mariupolis 2 have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film presents a realistic portrayal of the community without relying on stereotypical LGBTQ+ characters. Although specific LGBTQ+-related storylines are not highlighted, the documentary offers an unfiltered look at the wartime experience.

How does Mariupolis 2 portray gender?

Good

The documentary highlights the diverse roles played by individuals during a crisis. Women and caregivers take on significant responsibilities and show resilience in the face of bombing.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Mariupolis 2?

Good

By focusing on the residents of Mariupol, the film gives prominence to a non-Western population. It avoids Western-centric media agitation, allowing local cultural realities to shape the narrative.

How does Mariupolis 2 represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The work distances itself from institutional power by avoiding media and political agitation. It prioritizes the subjective truths of underrepresented communities over official state or capitalist-driven narratives.

Does Mariupolis 2 include disability representation?

Fair

The film addresses the physical trauma and resulting disabilities in a conflict zone. It provides a platform for the visibility of human vulnerability without resorting to inspirational stories.

Present on Screen

  • Prioritizes the ability to act and lived experiences of local subjects over mediated political narratives.
  • Challenges traditional institutional power by rejecting state-sponsored and media-driven information structures.
  • Provides an authentic, non-performative look at a non-Western population during a crisis.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit detail regarding specific LGBTQ+ narrative arcs or identities.
  • Does not provide specific visibility for neurodivergent or chronic illness narratives.
  • The ethnically cohesive demographic limits broader racial diversity within the specific setting.

Official Synopsis

In 2022, Mantas Kvedaravičius went back to Ukraine, Mariupol, at the heart of the war, to be with the people he had met and filmed in 2015. Following his death, his producers and collaborators have put all their strength into continuing transmitting his work, his vision and his films. Also a PhD in anthropology, Mantas Kvedaravičius wished to testify as a filmmaker as far as possible from the agitation of the media and the politicians. With huge force and sensitivity, Mariupolis 2 depicts life as it continues amidst the bombing and reveals images that convey both tragedy and hope.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.