You are here:

The Case of the Three Million

Name: The Case of the Three Million
Director: Yakov Protazanov
Released: 1926
Duration: 66 min

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

1926

Director

Yakov Protazanov

Runtime

66 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Three Million Trial is a satirical look at the friction between capital and community. It uses the absurdity of the judicial process to deconstruct the perceived stability of the old world social order. While the film provides a sharp critique of Western institutional morality, it lacks multi-layered depth. The narrative structure prioritizes systemic class critique over individual representation regarding race, gender, or sexual orientation. Ultimately, the film functions as a tool for social critique, though its focus remains narrow, centering on the breakdown of judicial order rather than diverse human identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Case of the Three Million have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any documented LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses solely on socioeconomic and judicial satire, leaving no room for non-cisgender identities.

How does The Case of the Three Million portray gender?

Fair

Gender hierarchies are shown through the lens of class struggle rather than individual empowerment. There is little evidence of women driving the plot or challenging traditional masculinity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Case of the Three Million?

Limited

The narrative centers on a localized conflict between a banker and a religious community. There is no evidence of a non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.

How does The Case of the Three Million represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film excels in its critique of traditional Western institutions. It portrays the legal system as an absurd, dysfunctional mechanism of capitalist society.

Does The Case of the Three Million include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no verifiable evidence that disability serves as a central narrative element or character arc in this film.

Present on Screen

Provides a sharp, effective critique of traditional Western institutions and capitalist legal structures.
Uses satire to successfully deconstruct the perceived stability of the old world social order.

Limited or Absent

Lacks characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity regarding gender, race, and LGBTQ+ identities.
Character roles appear tied strictly to class rather than individual identity or empowerment.

Official Synopsis

History of theft and double crossing when two thieves fall out over the theft of the money of the proceeds of the sale of a house by a banker to a religious community.

How are these scores produced? →