
Cries from Syria
2017

2016
Director
Mahamat-Saleh Haroun
Runtime
82 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In 2013, former Chadian dictator Hissein Habré’s arrest in Senegal marked the end of a long combat for the survivors of his regime. Accompanied by the Chairman of the Association of the Victims of the Hissein Habré Regime, Mahamat Saleh Haroun goes to meet those who survived this tragedy and who still bear the scars of the horror in their flesh and in their souls. Through their courage and determination, the victims accomplish an unprecedented feat in the history of Africa: that of bringing a Head of State to trial.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses on political justice and historical trauma. There is no explicit evidence regarding the depiction of non-cisnormative identities or LGBTQ+ narratives.
Gender Representation
The film centers on survivors who endured systemic violence, including women. It elevates the agency of those traditionally marginalized by patriarchal dictatorial structures.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
This film achieves exceptional representation by centering a non-Western, African-led narrative. It provides a platform for Chadian and Senegalese voices, disrupting the conventional Western-centric gaze.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques authoritarianism and the corrupting nature of absolute power. It prioritizes collective memory and the pursuit of justice over state-centric myths.
Disability Representation
The film highlights survivors bearing physical and psychological scars. It uses these experiences to anchor the narrative's emotional and political weight.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Mahamat-Saleh Haroun’s documentary is a powerful exercise in restorative media. By centering the legal struggle of Chadian and Senegalese victims, the film disrupts traditional Western-centric perspectives on African history. It grants significant agency to characters of color, allowing them to drive a global legal narrative. The film excels in racial and cultural representation, providing a platform for voices often sidelined in historical accounts. It moves away from the 'strongman' archetype to focus on the resilience of the oppressed. However, the film's scope is primarily political and historical. It does not explicitly address identity-specific politics such as LGBTQ+ narratives or neurodivergence, which limits its breadth in those specific categories.

2017

2017

1979

2023

2019

2012

2021

2014

2014

2008

2014

2018
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.