You are here:

Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont

Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

2020

Director

Tom O'Dell

Runtime

107 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont functions as a historical reconstruction of a specific cultural turning point. It prioritizes chronological and thematic accuracy over modern social issues. The documentary reflects the demographic and social hierarchies of the late 1960s. While it offers a nuanced look at the failure of social idealism, it lacks intentionality in addressing diverse identities. Ultimately, the film serves as a mirror to the era's specific musical and social landscape, capturing the transition from utopian optimism to chaotic violence.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on the Rolling Stones and the 1960s counterculture. It lacks explicit queer narratives or diverse gender identities, reflecting the era's mainstream focus.

How does Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on male band members and male-led security elements like the Hells Angels. The story emphasizes male-driven social movements and the breakdown of order.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont?

Limited

The documentary depicts a predominantly white rock scene of the 1960s. It reflects the era's demographic realities rather than prioritizing non-white ability to act or diverse representation.

How does Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film deconstructs the 1960s 'peace and love' idealism by documenting the descent into violence. It challenges traditional views of social stability and utopianism.

Does Days of Rage: The Rolling Stones' Road to Altamont include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters or historical figures with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on macro-societal shifts and specific concert events.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a nuanced deconstruction of the 1960s 'peace and love' idealism.
  • Effectively captures the breakdown of social order and the fragility of traditional stability.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ narratives or diverse gender identities.
  • Fails to include characters or historical figures with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Does not prioritize non-white ability to act within the central narrative arc.

Official Synopsis

The decade that began with peace and love was shattered in the late 1960s amidst riots, assassinations and a war that wouldn't end. The Rolling Stones became the voice of this new era, which came to a horrific end at the Altamont festival.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.