You are here:

Thirteen at Dinner

Thirteen at Dinner

Representation Score

2.5/10

Limited

1985

Not Rated

Director

Lou Antonio

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Thirteen at Dinner is a traditional mystery that prioritizes established genre clichés over social subversion. While the film provides a female lead with significant plot ability to act, the narrative remains anchored in conventional social hierarchies. The work lacks complexity in reflecting multiple aspects of identity, focusing instead on aristocratic domesticity and the classic whodunit structure. It functions as a standard genre piece rather than a critique of systemic norms. Ultimately, the film adheres to Eurocentric conventions and traditional Western values, offering little disruption to the status quo.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Thirteen at Dinner have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The story focuses on a domestic dispute and a murder investigation. There is no evidence of non-straight or non-cisgender identities or narratives that challenge the assumption that everyone is straight.

How does Thirteen at Dinner portray gender?

Fair

Jane Wilkinson serves as a proactive protagonist who drives the plot by initiating the central conflict. However, her role is exercised within traditional social and legal frameworks.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Thirteen at Dinner?

Limited

The setting centers on British aristocracy and the classic Poirot archetype. This suggests a homogeneous, Eurocentric cast aligned with traditional Anglo-centric mystery conventions.

How does Thirteen at Dinner represent religion and culture?

Limited

The film upholds Western social structures, specifically the British class system and marriage. It follows a standard restorative justice arc rather than critiquing systemic institutions.

Does Thirteen at Dinner include disability representation?

Minimal

The narrative provides no information regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Jane Wilkinson provides a proactive female lead who acts as the primary catalyst for the plot.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks racial and ethnic diversity, leaning into homogeneous Eurocentric clichés.
  • The story fails to include or represent characters with disabilities.
  • There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ representation or narratives that challenge the assumption that everyone is straight.

Official Synopsis

Actress Jane Wilkinson wants a divorce, but her husband, Lord Edgware, refuses. She convinces Hercule Poirot to use his famed tact and logic to make her case. Lord Edgware turns up murdered, a well-placed knife wound at the base of his neck. It will take the precise Poirot to sort out the lies from the alibis - and find the criminal before another victim dies.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.