You are here:

A People on the March

A People on the March

Representation Score

6.5/10

Good

1963

Director

Nasredine Guénifi, Ahmed Rachedi, René Vautier, Helena Sánchez, Sidi Boumedienne Dahmane, Mohamed Guenez, Allel Yahiaoui, Mohamed Bouamari, André Dumaître, Taïbi Mustapha Bellil

Runtime

55 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

A People on the March serves as a powerful act of historical reclamation. By focusing on the Algerian National Liberation Army and the lived experiences of the people, the film shifts the perspective from a colonial observer to an active participant. The collaborative filmmaking process between Algerian creators and René Vautier creates a cinematic bridge that challenges Eurocentric historical narratives. While the film excels in racial and cultural ability to act, it remains a product of its era and genre. It lacks specific representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities, focusing instead on the broader geopolitical struggle for sovereignty.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A People on the March have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on the Algerian War and the Algerian National Liberation Army. It does not explore LGBTQ+ identities or non-traditional gender roles.

How does A People on the March portray gender?

Fair

Women play active roles in the film, participating in resistance and reconstruction efforts. However, the film does not delve deeply into the impact on traditional masculinity.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A People on the March?

Excellent

By centering the Algerian experience, the film gives ability to act back to the non-Western majority. Collaborative production between Algerian and French filmmakers challenges traditional racial power structures.

How does A People on the March represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film portrays the struggle for independence as a fight for self-determination against oppressive Western institutions. It emphasizes local ability to act during the reconstruction period.

Does A People on the March include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses on geopolitical conflict and national reconstruction. There is insufficient information to evaluate the portrayal of specific disabilities or neurodivergence.

Present on Screen

  • The film centers the Algerian experience, disrupting Eurocentric historical narratives.
  • Collaborative production prioritizes the ability to act of the colonized population.
  • It successfully frames the struggle for independence as a pursuit of self-determination.

Limited or Absent

  • The documentary lacks explicit representation or character arcs for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Limited exploration of the impact on traditional masculinity.
  • No discernible evidence regarding the portrayal of disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Collectively directed by the members of the Centre audiovisuel d'Alger at Ben Aknoun, the film traces, in two parts, Algeria's recent history, from colonial repression to the birth of the National Liberation Army, and the country's postwar reconstruction, framed in sympathy with the socialist project of Ahmed Ben Bella's government. Released in 1964, the film was banned and sealed after Houari Boumediene's June 1965 coup, precisely because of its favorable treatment of Ben Bella.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.