You are here:
To Be Twenty in the Aures

To Be Twenty in the Aures

1972

Director

René Vautier

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A group of refractory and pacifist Bretons is sent to Algeria. These beings confronted with the horrors of war gradually become killing machines. One of them did not accept it and deserted, taking with him an FLN prisoner who was to be executed the next day. International Critics Prize at the 1972 Cannes Film Festival. Copy restored in 2012

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

8.1/10

Excellent


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film focuses on geopolitical and ethnic struggles rather than non-cisnormative identities. While it questions social hierarchies, it lacks specific character arcs addressing LGBTQ+ identities.

Gender Representation

Good

Women are portrayed as active participants in the resistance movement rather than passive subjects. This approach grants them agency and subverts traditional colonial gender tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The narrative centers Algerian ethnic and national identity. It positions the indigenous population as the primary agents of their destiny against an oppressive colonial administration.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques Western imperialist power and the institutions of colonial rule. It prioritizes the perspective of the colonized subject over Western institutional stability.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central narrative drivers in this work.

Strengths

  • Strong centering of Algerian ethnic and national identity as the narrative core.
  • Effective subversion of colonial tropes by granting women agency in the resistance.
  • Profound critique of Western imperialist power and institutional authority.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of explicit representation or character arcs for LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Absence of visible or invisible disability representation within the narrative.

AI Analysis

René Vautier’s film is a powerful deconstruction of colonial hegemony. By centering the Algerian struggle for sovereignty, the narrative shifts the focus away from Eurocentric perspectives and toward the agency of the indigenous population. The work excels in its portrayal of racial and cultural identity, effectively challenging the 'civilizing mission' myths of the era. It treats the colonial state as an oppressive force, providing a necessary critique of imperialist structures. While the film lacks specific representation for LGBTQ+ identities or disability, its subversion of traditional power hierarchies and its focus on gendered agency in resistance movements make it a significant piece of activist cinema.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.