
How Did They Ever Make a Movie of Facebook?
2011

2013
Runtime
49 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Both entertaining and educational, “How Not to Make a Movie” chronicles how the Red Letter Media guys all met and started making movies together, which lead to the disastrous production of the 2003 feature film collaboration Gorilla Interrupted. “How Not to Make a Movie” also shows the restoration process of remastering this ancient schlock no budget flop.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The documentary focuses on the technical and biographical history of a specific creative collective. It lacks intentional LGBTQ+ character development or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative is centered on a male-dominated circle of creators. It lacks female characters to provide a comparative subversion of traditional gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects a narrow, specialized demographic typical of low-budget independent documentaries. There is no evidence of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film engages in postmodernist deconstruction of the cinematic medium. It operates through professional cynicism rather than explicit religious or anti-Western critiques.
Disability Representation
While the film explores cinematic failure, it does not represent neurodivergence or physical disabilities as narrative drivers or character traits.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
How Not to Make a Movie is a niche, self-referential study of creative dysfunction. It prioritizes the deconstruction of film craft and technical imperfection over the exploration of social hierarchies or identity politics. The documentary functions as a meta-commentary on the filmmaking process itself. Because the focus remains strictly on the mechanics of a failed production, the film lacks the intersectional complexity found in broader social narratives. Ultimately, the work is a specialized biographical retrospective. It serves a specific comedic and technical purpose rather than attempting to engage with diverse social structures.

2011

2002

1997

1963

1998

2006

2009

2001

2009
1951

2013

1995
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.