You are here:

Somm III

Name: Somm III
Director: Jason Wise
Released: 2018
Duration: 80 min

Representation Score

5.0/10

Fair

2018

Director

Jason Wise

Runtime

80 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Somm III functions as a technical study of viticulture, prioritizing professional meritocracy over identity-driven storytelling. It challenges traditional gender roles by elevating female expertise to the same level as male industry legends. However, the film remains focused on the traditional demographics of the high-end wine industry, resulting in limited racial and ethnic diversity among the experts. Ultimately, the documentary challenges institutional prestige through blind tasting but does not actively seek to diversify the demographic profile of the wine world.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Somm III have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on professional wine tasting and industry legends. There are no explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs or narratives centered on non-cisgender identities.

How does Somm III portray gender?

Good

The narrative challenges traditional gender roles by centering Jancis Robinson. By placing her on equal footing with male legends, it disrupts the stereotype of the male-only wine authority.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Somm III?

Limited

The film focuses on established European and American wine hierarchies. The primary subjects and experts suggest a lack of significant racial or ethnic diversity within the core panels.

How does Somm III represent religion and culture?

Fair

The documentary critiques traditional Western institutional power by challenging the supremacy of Burgundy. It suggests value is based on sensory truth rather than historical geography.

Does Somm III include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no visible evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

Challenges traditional male-dominated industry archetypes by centering influential female figures like Jancis Robinson.
Promotes meritocratic relativism by deconstructing established hierarchies of prestige through blind tasting.

Limited or Absent

Lacks significant racial and ethnic diversity within the core tasting panels and expert groups.
Maintains a traditional demographic profile consistent with historical viticulture industry norms.

Official Synopsis

Three legends in the world of wine—Fred Dame, Steven Spurrier and Jancis Robinson—sit down in Paris to taste the rarest bottles of their careers. Dustin Wilson gathers the greatest blind tasters of today in New York City for a secret tasting similar to the original Judgment of Paris, with the goal to see if any of the world’s Pinot Noirs can stand up to the greatest Burgundies of France. In the end, both tastings cross with results that could change the world of wine forever.

How are these scores produced? →