You are here:

Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist

Name: Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist
Director: Alexandra Isles
Released: 1998
Duration: 54 min

Representation Score

4.4/10

Fair

1998

TV-PG

Director

Alexandra Isles

Runtime

54 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Scandalize My Name is a sophisticated historical examination that connects political ideology to racial oppression. It moves beyond simple inclusion by analyzing how dominant institutions used the Red Scare as a mechanism for racial control. The film provides actively leading visibility to Black performers and theatrical organizations. It expertly connects the Red Scare to the maintenance of Jim Crow laws. However, the documentary focuses heavily on male historical figures. While it includes female voices through interviews, the narrative structure lacks a central focus on gendered leadership or challenging gender hierarchies.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Its main focus is on the intersection of race and anti-communism during the blacklist era.

How does Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist portray gender?

Fair

The narrative centers on male historical figures such as Paul Robeson and Canada Lee. Women are included through interviews with era activists, but female leadership is not a primary focus.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist?

Excellent

The documentary centers on the experiences of Black performers and their ability to act. It highlights groups like the American Negro Theatre to show how anti-communism reinforced Jim Crow.

How does Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques Western political institutions, portraying them as tools of oppression. It uses a revisionist lens to challenge official 1950s narratives through the struggles of underrepresented groups.

Does Scandalize My Name: Stories from the Blacklist include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence that disability or neurodivergence serves as a central theme. The character studies do not focus on these specific lived experiences.

Present on Screen

Highlights the actively leading experiences of Black performers and theatrical organizations.
Connects the Red Scare to the maintenance of Jim Crow laws.
Challenges official historical narratives through a systemic critique of power.

Limited or Absent

Needs a stronger focus on female leadership or gendered perspectives.
Does not address LGBTQ+ narratives or identities within the political purges.

Official Synopsis

A look at the confluence of the Red Scare, McCarthyism, and blacklists with the post-war activism by African Americans seeking more and better roles on radio, television, and stage. It begins in Harlem, measures the impact of Paul Robeson and the campaign to bring him down, looks at the role of HUAC, J. Edgar Hoover and of journalists such as Ed Sullivan, and ends with a tribute to Canada Lee. Throughout are interviews with men and women who were there, including Dick Campbell of the Rose McLendon Players and Fredrick O'Neal of the American Negro Theatre. In the 1940s and 1950s, anti-Communism was one more tool to maintain Jim Crow and to keep down African-Americans.

How are these scores produced? →