
Strawman
1987

1986
Director
Nobuhiko Obayashi
Runtime
135 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
During the fervently nationalist months leading up to World War II, a rebellious teenager is transferred to a new primary school in a small Inland Sea town. He vies with the school’s reigning bully, who takes a romantic interest in his older stepsister. When they learn she’s going to be sold to a brothel to pay off her father’s debts, they form an uneasy alliance to free her.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on domestic and romantic tensions within a traditional Japanese setting. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The narrative shifts the lens toward female subjectivity by filtering the story through a girl's recollections. This provides a meaningful departure from typical male-centric war stories.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film maintains cultural authenticity through an almost exclusively Japanese cast. This commitment reflects the specific historical context of the Showa era.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
Obayashi uses a dreamlike style to critique encroaching nationalism and industrialization. The story mourns traditional agrarian lifestyles being dismantled by state-driven fervor.
Disability Representation
There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. No such traits serve as central drivers for the characters or the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Nobuhiko Obayashi’s work disrupts conventional historical drama by prioritizing fragmented memory over state-sanctioned narratives. The film succeeds in centering female subjectivity and emotional intelligence, offering a nuanced alternative to the male-dominated war films of the era. While the film is culturally authentic and provides a strong critique of nationalism, it lacks diversity in terms of LGBTQ+ representation and disability. The narrative remains largely within the social constraints of its historical setting. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its postmodern approach to history. It replaces rigid, official accounts with a subjective, personal truth that challenges traditional cinematic hierarchies.

1987

1992

1989

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.