You are here:

The Good Life

Name: The Good Life
Director: Robert Enrico
Released: 1964
Duration: 105 min

Representation Score

4.0/10

Limited

1964

Director

Robert Enrico

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film centers on the protagonist's disillusionment rather than showcasing diverse identities. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ or disability representation, focusing instead on the protagonist's struggle with post-war realities. Its strength lies in its subversion of the 'heroic' archetype, presenting a flawed and unheroic main character. The film engages with post-colonial themes through the lens of the Algerian War's aftermath, providing a geopolitical layer that prevents the story from being purely Eurocentric.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Good Life have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to traditional 1960s romantic ideals, focusing on heterosexual relationships and the protagonist's marriage and infidelity.

How does The Good Life portray gender?

Fair

Female characters play supporting roles, often lacking independent influence and serving mainly as catalysts for the male protagonist's psychological journey. However, the film avoids idealizing traditional femininity by showing the tensions and bitterness of domestic life.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Good Life?

Fair

The story is influenced by the aftermath of the Algerian War, introducing geopolitical tensions and complexities despite the predominantly Western cast.

How does The Good Life represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques the stability of socioeconomic conditions and the invasive nature of state institutions. It portrays the Army as a disruptive force that undermines personal freedom and individual liberation.

Does The Good Life include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed as central to the narrative arc.

Present on Screen

Subverts traditional cinematic comfort by presenting a flawed, unheroic protagonist.
Engages with post-colonial themes through the lens of the Algerian War's aftermath.
Critiques the stability of capitalist success and the invasive nature of state institutions.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Female characters often lack independent influence, serving primarily as catalysts for male development.
Provides no visibility for disability representation within the narrative arc.

Official Synopsis

After twenty-seven long months spent in Algeria, Frédéric Simon, a young photographer is determined to forget this time of trouble. Now that the Army has finally discharged him he wants to live the good life. And at first, things go according to his wishes: not only does he marry Sylvie but they are invited by a wealthy man to Monte Carlo, where they spend a dream honeymoon. But back in Paris, hard times await them. Not finding work easily along with having to live in a cramped apartment make Frédéric bitter and unpleasant. When Sylvie becomes pregnant, he slams the door and finds consolation in the arms of Christine, an ex girlfriend, which he soon regrets. At last, the situation improves. Frédéric finds work and starts making money as a fashion photographer. But the good life cannot go on: one morning a policeman knocks at the young couple's door: the country wants Frédéric back in the Army.

How are these scores produced? →