You are here:
The Third Saturday in October: Part V

The Third Saturday in October: Part V

2022

Director

Jay Burleson

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

It's Part V! Unstoppable killer Jakkariah "Jack" Harding is back in town after seven years as he stalks and kills at random before chancing upon a football watch party. The game is, of course, between longstanding rivals the Alabama-Mobile Seahawks and the Tennessee A&M Commonwealth. Chaos ensues, in increasingly ridiculous fashion, with inventive murders and multiple love triangles! Hearts are broken and appendages are torn.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film features multiple love triangles, suggesting complex romantic entanglements. However, the narrative lacks explicit confirmation of non-cisnormative identities or specific queer characters.

Gender Representation

Fair

The horror-comedy framework may subvert traditional gender hierarchies or the 'final girl' trope. Yet, the focus on ridiculous chaos suggests a reliance on farcical archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The setting revolves around a regional football rivalry. There is no specific evidence of a diverse cast or intentional use of race-bent casting within the synopsis.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story deconstructs social cohesion through a chaotic football watch party. It lacks explicit evidence of institutional critique or deep cultural commentary.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative contains no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities, neurodivergence, or chronic illness.

Strengths

  • The inclusion of multiple love triangles suggests a departure from strictly linear, heteronormative plot structures.
  • The horror-comedy genre provides opportunities to subvert traditional gender hierarchies and tropes.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit representation of non-cisnormative identities or diverse racial casting.
  • There is no evidence of characters with disabilities or neurodivergent representation.
  • The narrative appears to prioritize farcical archetypes over deep, character-driven agency.

AI Analysis

The film operates primarily within established horror-comedy tropes, prioritizing genre-based entertainment over intentional progressive representation. While the plot architecture allows for complex romantic dynamics and the disruption of social order, it lacks specific evidence of high-agency intersectional characters. The narrative focuses on chaos, inventive murders, and regional football rivalries. This suggests a reliance on traditional genre archetypes rather than a systemic critique of social or cultural institutions. Ultimately, the work functions as a franchise installment that leans toward situational absurdity rather than deep, character-driven social commentary.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.