You are here:

Sweet Smell of Success

Sweet Smell of Success

Representation Score

5.5/10

Fair

1957

Approved

Director

Alexander Mackendrick

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Sweet Smell of Success is a cynical, noir-style exploration of urban corruption. It effectively deconstructs Western institutions, particularly the media and capitalism, by portraying them as inherently predatory. The film's rejection of traditional moralism offers a progressive critique of systemic power structures. However, its 1950s setting limits meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities and features a largely homogeneous cast. Women primarily serve as catalysts for male ambitions rather than independent drivers of the plot. Overall, while the film excels in its thematic subversion of social structures, its demographic range is narrow, resulting in a low diversity score.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Sweet Smell of Success have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships and power dynamics, with no clear representation of LGBTQ+ identities or critiques of the assumption that everyone is straight.

How does Sweet Smell of Success portray gender?

Fair

The story emphasizes a traditional gender hierarchy. While Susan Hunsecker exhibits strong emotions, she mainly serves as a catalyst for male actions rather than being the main driver of the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Sweet Smell of Success?

Limited

The cast is predominantly uniform, reflecting the demographics of 1950s New York journalism. Although jazz culture adds atmosphere, racial diversity is not a central theme.

How does Sweet Smell of Success represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critically examines capitalism and media institutions, portraying the press and Broadway establishment as oppressive forces that demand ruthless behavior.

Does Sweet Smell of Success include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the central storyline. The narrative lacks diversity in neurodivergent or physical conditions.

Present on Screen

  • Sophisticated deconstruction of predatory Western institutions and media power.
  • Rejection of traditional moralism in favor of complex, situational ethics.
  • Nuanced portrayal of female resistance against dominant patriarchal authority.

Limited or Absent

  • Lack of LGBTQ+ identities or queer perspectives in the narrative.
  • Minimal racial and ethnic diversity among the characters.
  • Absence of characters representing physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

New York City newspaper writer J.J. Hunsecker holds considerable sway over public opinion with his Broadway column, but one thing that he can't control is his younger sister, Susan, who is in a relationship with aspiring jazz guitarist Steve Dallas. Hunsecker strongly disapproves of the romance and recruits publicist Sidney Falco to find a way to split the couple, no matter how ruthless the method.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.