You are here:
Dracula A.D. 2015

Dracula A.D. 2015

2015

NR

Director

Joshua Kennedy

Runtime

59 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In this homage to Hammer Films, a group of university students resurrect Dracula who then goes on a killing spree.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks visible representation of non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focuses on a classic horror archetype without exploring queer perspectives or critiquing heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story utilizes a standard horror ensemble that aligns with conventional genre expectations. There is no evidence of women demonstrating significant agency or subverting traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The production leans into a Eurocentric aesthetic reminiscent of Hammer Horror. There is no indication of a non-white majority cast or intentional casting to challenge historical norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot centers on supernatural resurrection within established horror tropes. It does not appear to offer critiques of religion, capitalism, or Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the inclusion of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the film's context.

Strengths

  • The film successfully captures the specific stylistic essence of classic Hammer Horror films.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks intentional representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • The film fails to subvert traditional gender hierarchies or provide female agency.
  • There is a lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the ensemble.
  • The story does not engage with cultural or religious critiques.

AI Analysis

Dracula A.D. 2015 functions primarily as a stylistic homage to the Hammer Horror era. It prioritizes traditional gothic tropes and genre conventions over the integration of intersectional identities or progressive narrative frameworks. The film operates within a narrow, Eurocentric aesthetic. While the university setting offers potential for demographic variety, the narrative lacks evidence of intentional racial, gender, or queer subversion. Ultimately, the production serves as a traditional genre piece. It lacks the systemic indicators of progressive intent required to challenge established social hierarchies or provide diverse representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.