You are here:

Time of the Gods

Name: Time of the Gods
Director: Lutz Dammbeck
Released: 1992
Duration: 95 min

Representation Score

3.4/10

Limited

1992

Director

Lutz Dammbeck

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Lutz Dammbeck’s documentary is a cerebral, philosophical exploration of how political power shapes art. It prioritizes a semiotic analysis of fascist symbols over traditional character-driven storytelling, making it an intellectual rather than a demographic study. The film excels at deconstructing the perceived purity of Western cultural institutions. By exposing the link between aesthetics and systemic power, it offers a sophisticated critique of how political shifts co-opt artistic expression. However, the work lacks demographic breadth. Because it focuses on historical and political structures rather than human narratives, it provides no representation for LGBTQ+ individuals, diverse racial identities, or people with disabilities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Time of the Gods have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any characters or storylines related to LGBTQ+ identities. There are no representations or derogatory depictions of LGBTQ+ individuals.

How does Time of the Gods portray gender?

Fair

The documentary focuses on systemic power structures rather than interpersonal gender dynamics. Its critique of historical institutions inherently challenges patriarchal foundations.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Time of the Gods?

Fair

The film examines the aesthetic language of European fascism within a Western context. It analyzes how dominant political structures manipulate identity through symbolic language.

How does Time of the Gods represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative questions the integrity of Western cultural institutions and the corruption of cultural objects. It suggests that no art is immune to the influence of political power.

Does Time of the Gods include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary's thematic scope and format do not include the depiction of physical or neurodivergent characters.

Present on Screen

Provides a sophisticated deconstruction of the relationship between ethics and aesthetics.
Challenges traditional hierarchies by exposing how power influences cultural symbols.
Offers a high-level intellectual critique of Western institutional integrity.

Limited or Absent

Lacks demographic diversity due to its focus on abstract political structures.
Provides no representation for LGBTQ+, racial, or disability-related identities.
The absence of character-driven narratives limits its interpersonal relatability.

Official Synopsis

The film explores what transformations in power and politics do to art, how much opportunism can be found in “pure” art and whether fascist symbols can ever regain their aesthetic innocence. The questions it addresses about the relationship between ethics and aesthetics make a valuable contribution to any discussion about art and power.

How are these scores produced? →