You are here:
La última luna

La última luna

2005

Director

Miguel Littín

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Palestine 1914. One morning in July, Soliman, a young Palestinian and Jacob, his Jewish friend, begin to build a house in Beit-Sajour, in the hills of Judea, with stones brought from Beit-Jala, while the apparent stillness of the place is interrupted by bursts of violence that anticipate the future days of the war.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on geopolitical and ethnic tensions in the early 20th-century Levant. There is no discernible presence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

Plot drivers are primarily male-centric, centered on political and social tensions. While women exist within the social fabric, they largely occupy roles defined by the broader conflict rather than exercising independent agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film excels by centering the relationship between Soliman, a Palestinian, and Jacob, a Jewish man. This disrupts monolithic portrayals of identity and provides a nuanced look at intersectional experiences.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative engages with post-colonial themes and the systemic displacement of populations in 1914 Palestine. It critiques the corruption of state-driven violence and the fragility of peace.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities serving as central agents. The narrative focus remains on the physical and political survival of the protagonists.

Strengths

  • Provides a nuanced depiction of ethnic intersections through the friendship of Palestinian and Jewish characters.
  • Challenges the traditional cinematic gaze by prioritizing a non-Western, non-Anglo-Saxon perspective.
  • Engages deeply with post-colonial themes and the systemic forces of territorial expansion.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or queer-coded character development.
  • Women occupy roles defined by conflict rather than exercising independent agency to disrupt gender hierarchies.
  • Provides no significant representation of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

AI Analysis

Miguel Littín’s work succeeds as a piece of socially conscious cinema by centering a non-Western historical struggle. The film's strength lies in its sophisticated handling of ethnic intersectionality and its critique of systemic oppression through the lens of the Levant's complex history. However, the film adheres to traditional character archetypes regarding gender and identity. The narrative scope is dominated by macro-level territorial conflicts, which leaves little room for diverse personal identities or the subversion of established social hierarchies. Ultimately, the film is a powerful exploration of cultural and racial complexity, even if it remains limited in its representation of gender agency and LGBTQ+ perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.