You are here:

Pretoria to Durban

Pretoria to Durban

Representation Score

0.3/10

Minimal

1952

Approved

Runtime

9 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Pretoria to Durban serves as a temporal artifact of 1952 South Africa, reflecting the exclusionary social and political hierarchies of its era. The documentary focuses on the administrative and geographical divisions of the Union, such as the Transvaal and Natal, through a strictly colonial-era lens. Because the film prioritizes statehood and geopolitical structures, it fails to provide any meaningful character development or diverse perspectives. It functions to validate the existing status quo rather than offering a critical or inclusive view of the region's inhabitants. Ultimately, the work is a product of its time, offering a limited viewpoint that bypasses the complexities of the multi-ethnic landscape it documents.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Pretoria to Durban have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not depict any LGBTQ+ identities. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ presence or ability to act within this historical documentary.

How does Pretoria to Durban portray gender?

Limited

The documentary follows 1950s travelogue standards by focusing on landscapes rather than people. It lacks any exploration of gendered social roles or ability to act.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Pretoria to Durban?

Minimal

The narrative is explicitly framed from a white person's viewpoint. It reinforces dominant social structures and lacks the ability to act of non-white subjects.

How does Pretoria to Durban represent religion and culture?

Minimal

The film emphasizes Western institutional frameworks and administrative unity. It lacks any critique of the systemic power dynamics inherent in the period.

Does Pretoria to Durban include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of individuals with visible or invisible disabilities. The film does not engage with neurodivergence or physical accessibility.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a historical glimpse into the 1952 South African geopolitical landscape.
  • Offers documentation of the administrative divisions of the Union of South Africa.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of non-white subjects and their ability to act.
  • Fails to include any LGBTQ+ or disability-related narratives.
  • Reinforces colonial-era perspectives and Western institutional frameworks.
  • Provides no exploration of gendered social roles or ability to act.

Official Synopsis

This Traveltalk series short gives a glimpse into South African history, albeit from a white person's viewpoint. South Africa is a union of four separate states: the Transvaal, the Orange Free State, Natal, and the Cape Provence.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.