You are here:
Speakeasy

Speakeasy

1929

Passed

Director

Benjamin Stoloff

Runtime

62 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Newspaper staffer Alice Woods persuades the editor to allow her to chase a story, that of prizefight contender Martin, who is about to fight for the championship. However, he does not know that his manager is preparing to double-cross him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.6/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any indication of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. It follows a traditional dramatic structure focused on professional ambition and athletic competition.

Gender Representation

Fair

Alice Woods provides a notable degree of agency as a proactive journalist. She disrupts passive female tropes by persuading her editor to pursue a story, though her broader impact on gender hierarchies remains unclear.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no evidence of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon characters. The narrative likely reflects the homogeneous casting standards typical of 1929.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The story focuses on individual morality and professional ethics within journalism and sports. It utilizes Western institutional norms as a backdrop rather than challenging them.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative contains no mention of characters navigating physical, sensory, or neurodivergent experiences.

Strengths

  • The female protagonist, Alice Woods, displays significant agency and professional competence.
  • The narrative disrupts common passive female tropes by making the woman a proactive driver of the plot.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • There is a total absence of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast and setting.
  • The story provides no visibility for characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Speakeasy is a conventional period drama that adheres closely to the industrial norms of the late 1920s. While it avoids some common pitfalls of the era, it lacks the intersectional complexity needed for a progressive score. The film's primary strength lies in its female protagonist, who displays professional competence and agency. However, this is offset by a complete absence of racial, LGBTQ+, or disability representation. Ultimately, the film functions as a standard drama centered on professional betrayal and athletic competition, offering little in the way of social critique or diverse perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.