You are here:

In Between

In Between

Representation Score

6.4/10

Good

1978

Director

Jonas Mekas

Runtime

53 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

In Between serves as a cinematic diary documenting a period of cultural re-evaluation. By compiling footage from the mid-1960s, Jonas Mekas captures a progressive resistance to the status quo, highlighting the voices of the avant-garde. The film's strength lies in its ability to challenge traditional storytelling norms. It offers a glimpse into a world where identity and social roles were being redefined outside of mainstream Western institutions. While the film excels at capturing the spirit of non-conformity and queer presence, its scope is limited to the specific demographics of the mid-century bohemian art scene.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does In Between have LGBTQ+ representation?

Good

The film highlights figures like Jack Smith and Jane Holzer, representing the queer avant-garde. It integrates various gender identities into the creative environment of the New York underground without treating them as secondary.

How does In Between portray gender?

Good

Women such as Shirley Clarke and Jane Holzer play crucial roles in shaping the experimental film scene. However, the observational style focuses more on the atmosphere and less on explicitly challenging gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is In Between?

Fair

The footage primarily reflects the diverse intellectual personalities within the 1960s New York underground subcultures. It captures a range of backgrounds within the mid-century experimental art scene.

How does In Between represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The work celebrates spontaneous non-conformity and rejects traditional authority. It emphasizes subjective experience over structured morality, focusing on those sidelined by mainstream society.

Does In Between include disability representation?

Minimal

There is insufficient evidence within the footage to assess the portrayal of visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Captures key figures of the queer avant-garde in a non-judgmental, observational framework.
  • Highlights women as central, influential architects within the experimental film scene.
  • Challenges traditional Western institutional norms by celebrating bohemian spontaneity and non-conformity.

Limited or Absent

  • Representation is largely centered on specific mid-century bohemian subcultures rather than a broader racial spectrum.
  • The observational style lacks a clear focus on the role women play in subverting gendered hierarchies.
  • Insufficient evidence exists to address the representation of individuals with disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Footage from 1964-1968 that did not find its way into the Walden reels is joined in this classic period piece. Mostly centered in New York, it also includes travel footage and appearances by David Wise, Salvador Dali, Allen Ginsberg, Jack Smith, Shirley Clarke, Jane Holzer and more. Mel Lyman plays his banjo on the roof.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.