You are here:
Incorrigible

Incorrigible

1975

Director

Philippe de Broca

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Victor Vautier is incorrigible: he's in constant motion, working several cons at once, using different names and changing disguises. He's charming and outrageous, incapable of uttering a sentence that isn't embellished or an outright lie. His life goal is to make enough money to build a sea wall to protect Mont-Saint-Michel. Charlotte, a parole officer, shows up: she's young and seems taken in by Victor. He discovers she lives above the Senlus Museum, where her parents are the curators. With two pals he decides to steal a priceless El Greco triptych and then ransom it back to the cultural ministry. What will Charlotte do when she realizes he's used her to make a fortune?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film centers on a traditional romantic tension between Victor and Charlotte. There is no evidence of same-sex intimacy or non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Charlotte holds a position of institutional authority as a parole officer. However, her agency is limited by a narrative arc that emphasizes her emotional susceptibility to the male lead.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast is predominantly homogeneous, reflecting the specific French historical context. The film does not feature diverse ethnic ensembles or race-bent casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story subverts social order by framing anti-social behavior as charismatic liberation. It also critiques cultural institutions through the attempted theft of a high-value art piece.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no visible or invisible disabilities portrayed as central to the narrative arc of the film.

Strengths

  • The narrative successfully challenges the sanctity of state authority and legal structures.
  • It provides a critique of cultural institutions through the lens of opportunistic redistribution.
  • The film celebrates individual eccentricity and the disruption of social hierarchies.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity within its cast.
  • Gender roles lean toward traditional tropes, limiting female agency.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.

AI Analysis

Philippe de Broca’s film is a character study of individualistic rebellion rather than a diverse ensemble piece. It prioritizes the whimsy of a non-conforming protagonist over modern identity-driven frameworks. The film lacks intersectional representation regarding race, gender identity, and disability. It adheres to the cinematic norms of 1975, focusing on a localized French setting and heteronormative romance. However, it earns points for its narrative architecture. By celebrating the disruption of state authority and legal structures, the film offers a unique critique of institutional morality.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.