New Showbiz

You are here:
The Calling of Dan Matthews

The Calling of Dan Matthews

1935

Approved

Director

Phil Rosen

Runtime

67 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Dan Matthews (Richard Arlen), a young parson, is in love with Hope Strong (Charlotte Wynters), the daughter of James B. Strong ('FRederick Burton'), a man who controls the town with his real estate and business interests. Strong is an upstanding citizen who has fallen into the hands of a clever racketeer, Jeff Hardy (Douglass Dumbrille), who acts as Strong's manager of some innocent-appearing amusement places that are really secret dens of vice.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.8/10

Minimal

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The story follows a traditional heterosexual romance between Dan Matthews and Hope Strong. No non-cisnormative identities or critiques of heteronormativity are present.

Gender Representation

Limited

Female characters like Hope Strong are defined by their relationships to men. Moral agency and leadership are concentrated almost exclusively in the male protagonists.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The cast appears homogeneous, reflecting the era's studio norms. There is no evidence of racial blending or diverse identities challenging the social status quo.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot centers on a binary struggle between clergy-led morality and systemic vice. It reinforces traditional Western institutions rather than critiquing them.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative contains no documented characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • The film provides a clear, structured moral conflict between virtue and criminality.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks diverse racial and ethnic representation.
  • Female characters lack independent agency and power.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities.
  • The narrative reinforces traditional social and religious hierarchies.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a standard 1930s genre piece, relying heavily on established archetypes. It prioritizes a conventional moral struggle between a parson and a racketeer, which reinforces the social hierarchies of its time rather than subverting them. Representation is limited by the era's studio system. The narrative focuses on a heterosexual romantic core and a homogeneous cast, offering little room for intersectional complexity or diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the film functions within a rigid framework of mid-century moralism. It lacks the character agency or social disruption necessary to move beyond a traditional, narrow worldview.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.