You are here:

To Return

Name: To Return
Director: David Lipszyc
Released: 1982
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

5.6/10

Fair

1982

Director

David Lipszyc

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

To Return is a sociopolitical drama that prioritizes systemic critique over broad demographic representation. It uses personal relationships to mirror the instability of the Argentine military regime, providing a nuanced look at national identity and the human cost of political exile. The film's strength lies in its cultural critique of state authority and capitalist institutions, and its nuanced exploration of the Argentine diaspora. However, the film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities and disabilities. The narrative remains focused on the interpersonal dynamics of a specific, heterosexual social circle, limiting its broader inclusivity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does To Return have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on heterosexual relationships involving the protagonist, an ex-girlfriend, and a former friend. There is no indication of characters who do not identify with their assigned gender at birth.

How does To Return portray gender?

Fair

A female character plays a crucial role in the protagonist's emotional journey. The film challenges traditional power structures by emphasizing the importance of women's roles over those traditionally associated with men.

How racially and ethnically diverse is To Return?

Fair

The story explores the complexities of Argentine national identity and the impact of the military government on various social strata.

How does To Return represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film strongly critiques traditional institutional power and state authority. It portrays the sociopolitical landscape of 1980s Argentina as a site of systemic tension and moral complexity.

Does To Return include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters with physical or cognitive disabilities in the narrative.

Present on Screen

Strong cultural critique of state authority and capitalist institutions.
Nuanced exploration of national identity and the Argentine diaspora.
Effective use of female roles to drive the emotional narrative.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit LGBTQ+ representation within the central plot.
Absence of visible disability representation or neurodivergent characters.
Narrow focus on heterosexual romantic and social dynamics.

Official Synopsis

An Argentine-executive of a multinational-returns to the country to close a factory. There he meets with his exgirlfriend and his best friend before the exile. The film presents an interpretation of the political and social situation in Argentina during the last years of the military government.

How are these scores produced? →