
Fire in the Blood
2013

2020
TV-14Director
Anthony Baxter
Runtime
114 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In 2014, the authorities in Flint, Michigan chose to cut costs and change the city’s domestic water supply from the great Lakes to the Flint River. Soon tap water was running brown, people were falling ill and it was clear that something was seriously wrong. Anthony Baxter (You’ve Been Trumped) has followed the situation over six years of denial, evasion, betrayal and hypocrisy in which the city’s poorest residents have suffered the most. The result is shocking and sad as it illuminates the inequalities of the modern world and celebrates the solidarity of ordinary people.
Overall Score
Excellent
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film maintains a neutral stance regarding LGBTQ+ identities. It does not center queer-specific storylines or non-heteronormative narratives as primary thematic drivers for the plot.
Gender Representation
Women are portrayed as the primary architects of community resistance. The film elevates local mothers and female leaders as intellectual and political agents rather than domestic figures.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentary provides exceptional representation by centering a predominantly Black, working-class community. It offers a profound study of environmental racism through the authentic agency of residents of color.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative prioritizes collective community agency over established political or capitalist structures. It frames the struggle as a conflict between a marginalized populace and oppressive state bureaucracy.
Disability Representation
Physical health impacts from lead poisoning are treated as central to the struggle. The film portrays these medical realities as direct consequences of institutional failure rather than tropes of pity.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Anthony Baxter’s documentary is a powerful examination of systemic negligence and environmental racism. By centering the lived experiences of Flint's most vulnerable residents, the film moves beyond mere observation to provide a rigorous critique of institutional betrayal. The film excels in its portrayal of racial and ethnic diversity, granting significant agency to the Black community fighting for justice. It also effectively subverts gender hierarchies by positioning women as the central leaders of political mobilization. While the film lacks specific focus on LGBTQ+ identities, its strength lies in its intersectional approach to socioeconomic and racialized vulnerability. It successfully transforms a public health crisis into a profound study of community solidarity.

2013

1997

2008

2014

2019

2017

2021

2018

2022

2020

2020

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.