You are here:

Georgia, Alone

Georgia, Alone

Representation Score

5.3/10

Fair

1995

Director

Otar Iosseliani

Runtime

236 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Otar Iosseliani’s documentary is a sophisticated exploration of Georgian identity and post-Soviet transition. It succeeds by centering a localized, non-Western perspective and utilizing the artistry of regional filmmakers to challenge monolithic historical narratives. The film's strength lies in its intellectual nuance and its ability to deconstruct political hegemony. By focusing on the complexities of societal shifts and the legacies of political figures, it avoids the clichés of traditional political dramas. However, the film lacks explicit representation of specific identity groups. The narrative prioritizes landscape and political history over the inclusion of LGBTQ+ narratives or visible disability representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Georgia, Alone have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The documentary focuses on historical and sociological studies of a nation in transition. There are no explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or characters in this political and landscape-driven study.

How does Georgia, Alone portray gender?

Fair

The film prioritizes daily rhythms and socioeconomic realities over aggressive masculine clichés. However, it lacks specific evidence of women's ability to drive the central political discourse.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Georgia, Alone?

Good

The work serves as a vital act of cultural preservation for a post-Soviet republic. It centers a non-Western perspective by utilizing the cinematic language of local Georgian filmmakers.

How does Georgia, Alone represent religion and culture?

Good

The film excels in critiquing institutional structures and deconstructing state power. It favors a subjective, contemplative morality over singular, state-mandated ideologies or traditional Western stability.

Does Georgia, Alone include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the depiction of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities within this work.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a vital, localized exploration of Georgian identity and cultural preservation.
  • Challenges Western-centric gazes by centering non-Anglo-Saxon cinematic perspectives.
  • Offers a sophisticated deconstruction of state power and institutional structures.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or characters within the historical study.
  • Provides limited evidence of women's ability to drive the political discourse.
  • Contains no documented representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The horrific war in Chechnya, a neighbor of Georgia, gives a special poignancy to Otar Iosseliani’s fascinating, four-hour, made-for-television documentary on Georgia which, like his delightful Chasing Butterflies (SFIFF 1993), was produced in France. Iosseliani presents the history of this former Soviet republic through beautifully interwoven images of landscapes, artwork and clips from other Georgian filmmakers such as Nikoloz Shengalaya and Tenghiz Abuladze. He illuminates the part played recently by two politicians, both KGB men but with very different destinies: Zviad Gamsakhurdia, an ultranationalistic demagogue who died in exile; and Eduard Shevardnadze, who is the president of Georgia today.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.