The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. While the central adultery challenges marital norms, it does not address queer identity.

Mari Gaila acts as a transgressive agent by disrupting domestic hierarchies through infidelity. However, her eventual punishment suggests a return to traditional gendered social orders.

The narrative focuses on socio-economic stratification among marginalized groups. There is no evidence of intentional racial diversity or non-white casting.

The film critiques religious and familial institutions by portraying a sacristan involved in exploitation. It centers on social outcasts living on the fringes of society.

Characters with disabilities are present but appear to be used as objects of exploitation. They lack individual agency and serve primarily as plot devices.