
Order of the Daisy
1967

1970
Director
Jean-Pierre Mocky
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Veterinary surgeon William Chaminade is having a peaceful holiday in the South of France when he is witness to an event that will change not only his life but the destiny of France! A young woman tries to kill herself by jumping from the upstairs window of the hotel where he is staying. Thanks to the services of a passing athlete, the woman is unharmed, and she reveals that her distress is down to her husband’s apparent lack of interest in her. Immediately, Chaminade has a brainwave. He will open a special centre for people like this unfortunate young woman, who will be able to satisfy their romantic needs, at the tax payers’ expense. All is well until this innovative ’pleasure centre’ draws the attention of an over-zealous tax inspector, Dupuis...
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on heteronormative romantic and sexual pursuits. There is an absence of non-cisnormative gender identities or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.
Gender Representation
Gender dynamics center on male pursuit and female emotional vulnerability. While satirical elements occasionally deconstruct these roles, the film largely relies on traditional gendered tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting reflects a homogeneous social circle in the South of France. There is no evidence of intentional racial blending or intersectional casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative offers a cynical critique of Western institutional stability and state-run corruption. It uses satire to disrupt conventional expectations of civic responsibility and morality.
Disability Representation
A character's suicide attempt suggests psychological distress, but it is unclear if this is handled with agency. There is insufficient evidence to assess neurodivergence.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The Stud is a satirical character study that prioritizes irreverence over demographic representation. It functions as a critique of social hierarchies and institutional corruption rather than a platform for marginalized identities. While the film challenges traditional morality through its protagonist's absurd 'pleasure centre,' it remains anchored in conventional gender roles and a homogeneous social landscape. The lack of intersectional complexity keeps the diversity profile low. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its postmodern subversion of social contracts, even as it fails to provide meaningful visibility for LGBTQ+ or diverse racial groups.

1967

1968

1974

1979

1979

1969

1976

1972

1970

1972

1967

1970
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.