Homo Eroticus
1971
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.5 out of 10
You are here:
The Eroticist
Representation Score
1.7/10
Minimal
1972
RDirector
Lucio Fulci
Runtime
109 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
The film is a traditional character comedy centered around personal impulses and societal norms. It emphasizes conventional comedic formulas rather than challenging social or gender power structures. The narrative lacks complexity in addressing multiple aspects of identity, reinforcing existing hierarchies instead of disrupting them. The story revolves around a male lead's private struggles and public responsibilities. Overall, the film adheres to a standard 1970s European framework, lacking in progressive social representation or diverse perspectives.
Category Breakdown
Does The Eroticist have LGBTQ+ representation?
The story focuses on a male protagonist's strong attraction to women. There are no representations of non-straight or non-cisgender identities, nor does it challenge the idea that everyone is straight or cisgender.
How does The Eroticist portray gender?
Female characters mainly serve as objects of the male protagonist's desires. This dynamic implies a traditional power structure where women have limited influence over their own lives.
How racially and ethnically diverse is The Eroticist?
The film seems to follow a typical Western storyline. There is no indication of a racially diverse cast in the political or religious settings.
How does The Eroticist represent religion and culture?
The story involves traditional Western institutions such as the church and government. It may subtly criticize the hypocrisy found within these institutions.
Does The Eroticist include disability representation?
The film does not depict any physical or cognitive disabilities. The protagonist's behavior does not provide enough context to assess how disabilities are represented.
Present on Screen
- The film potentially satirizes the hypocrisy within political and religious institutions.
Limited or Absent
- The film heavily relies on the male perspective, presenting women as objects rather than characters with significant roles.
- The story fails to include representations of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender gender expressions.
- The narrative lacks racial and ethnic diversity within the depicted social settings.
Official Synopsis
Senator Pupis feels a strong and uncontrollable urge to grab women's bottoms, a habit than can lead to embarrassment, especially if the woman in question is head of another state and the occasion a state visit. In his desperation Pupis turns to the clergy for spiritual and psychological help.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
The Monster
1994
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.2 out of 10
The Married Priest
1970
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.2 out of 10
Smell of Flesh
1975
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.4 out of 10
The Household
1974
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.7 out of 10
Fancy a Woman
1978
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.1 out of 10
Vow of Chastity
1976
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.8 out of 10
La commessa
1975
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.