The Maniacs
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Eroticist
1972
Director
Lucio Fulci
Runtime
109 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Senator Pupis feels a strong and uncontrollable urge to grab women's bottoms, a habit than can lead to embarrassment, especially if the woman in question is head of another state and the occasion a state visit. In his desperation Pupis turns to the clergy for spiritual and psychological help.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.8/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative centers on a male protagonist's compulsive attraction to women. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
Women function primarily as objects of the protagonist's impulses. This dynamic suggests a traditional hierarchy where female characters lack independent agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film appears to operate within a traditional Western framework. There is no evidence of a diverse or non-white cast within the political or clerical settings.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story engages with traditional Western institutions like the clergy and the state. It may subtly critique the hypocrisy of political and religious authority.
Disability Representation
The film provides no information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent conditions. The protagonist's urges lack sufficient context to determine their portrayal.
Strengths
- The film offers a potential satire of the hypocrisy found within political and religious institutions.
Areas for Improvement
- The film relies heavily on the male gaze, positioning women as objects rather than characters with agency.
- The narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative gender expressions.
- There is a notable absence of racial and ethnic diversity within the depicted social settings.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a traditional character comedy focused on individual impulse and institutional decorum. It prioritizes conventional comedic tropes over the disruption of social or gendered power dynamics. The narrative lacks intersectional complexity, reinforcing established hierarchies rather than subverting them. The focus remains on a male lead's private compulsions versus his public duties. Ultimately, the work operates within a standard 1970s European framework, offering little in the way of progressive social representation or diverse perspectives.
Similar Movies
My Sister in Law
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
Tales of Erotica
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The Prophet
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
The Moralist
1959
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
The Young Seducers
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Emanuelle in the Country
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Long Live the Seal
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
The Stud
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Totò Sexy
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
El erótico enmascarado
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The School Teacher
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.