
What if we talk about August?
1980

1972
RDirector
Saul Landau, Raúl Ruiz, Nina Serrano
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Mordant, self-aware, freighted with sensitivity toward Chile’s problem, wary of caricature, disposed toward consciousness of human fallibility, it is a deft blend of fiction and documentary set in the tumultuous days leading up to the election of Salvador Allende in 1970.
Overall Score
Excellent
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film's roots in radical, experimental cinema suggest a departure from heteronormative storytelling. While specific character arcs are not detailed, the era's avant-garde movements often embraced non-traditional social dynamics.
Gender Representation
Directed by Nina Serrano, the film challenges patriarchal hierarchies by focusing on human fallibility. It likely portrays women as active agents within the Chilean revolutionary landscape rather than passive observers.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative centers a non-Anglo-Saxon political reality by focusing on the Chilean struggle. This shift validates the lived experiences and agency of Latin American populations against Western hegemony.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques traditional Western institutions through an anti-imperialist framework. It deconstructs established global hierarchies by exploring power dynamics during the rise of Salvador Allende.
Disability Representation
There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent characters in the available material.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
What Is to Be Done? is a sophisticated political drama that disrupts conventional Western-centric narratives. By blending fiction with documentary, the film centers the agency of the Chilean people during a pivotal historical moment. The creative team's pedigree in Third Cinema suggests a deliberate effort to challenge traditional power structures. The film moves away from commercial tropes to prioritize socio-political critique and systemic analysis. While the film excels in cultural and racial representation, it lacks specific details regarding disability or explicit LGBTQ+ character arcs. However, its radical framework provides a progressive foundation for diverse social dynamics.

1980

2017

1975

1967

1996

1975

1972

1987

2016

1999

1977

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.