You are here:

Friend

Friend

Representation Score

1.8/10

Minimal

2001

Not Rated

Director

Kwak Kyung-taek

Runtime

118 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Friend is a seminal South Korean noir that delves into the complexities of localized social structures and male camaraderie. It succeeds in offering a deep immersion into a specific era of South Korean history and the intricacies of peer loyalty. However, the film relies heavily on traditional masculine clichés and a homogeneous cast. The narrative structure focuses on masculine hierarchies and criminal syndicates, reinforcing conventional gender roles. While the film challenges institutional authority through situational ethics, it lacks broad demographic representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Friend have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to a strictly heterosexual and cisgender framework, with no visible presence of LGBTQ+ identities or critiques of heterosexuality.

How does Friend portray gender?

Limited

The narrative is predominantly male-focused, centered around masculine strength and stoicism. Female characters are peripheral, serving mainly as background elements rather than active agents.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Friend?

Limited

The cast and setting are highly homogeneous, reflecting a specific South Korean demographic without incorporating diverse backgrounds.

How does Friend represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores moral relativism by juxtaposing a criminal code of honor against state-sanctioned legality. It provides a nuanced view of how socioeconomic environments shape organized crime.

Does Friend include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of visible or invisible disabilities within the primary character arcs.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a deeply immersive portrayal of a specific era in South Korean history.
  • Explores the nuanced relationship between socioeconomic environments and individual life paths.
  • Uses moral relativism effectively to challenge institutional authority.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks gender diversity, with female characters sidelined.
  • No representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender individuals.
  • Homogeneous casting that fails to include diverse backgrounds.

Official Synopsis

Despite their different family backgrounds, four friends grew up together in the wearisome years of the 70s. But as time goes by, each of them takes a different life path.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.