The Parasite
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Grasshopper
1955
Director
Samson Samsonov
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Osip Dymov, the titular counselor and the doctor of thirty one years, serves in two hospitals at the same time: intern and anatomist. From nine o'clock in the morning and in the forenoon accepts patients, then goes to open corpses. But its income is hardly enough for a covering of expenses of the wife mad about talents and celebrities in the art and artistic environment whom it daily accepts in the house.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.2/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a traditional marital dynamic. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The story establishes a gendered dichotomy between the male professional and the social-climbing wife. It reinforces traditional roles of male provider and female socialite.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting reflects the demographic homogeneity of the mid-century Soviet era. There is no indication of a multi-ethnic cast or diverse racial representation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative explores tensions regarding social prestige and professional stability. It functions within the established social morality of its time rather than deconstructing systemic structures.
Disability Representation
While the protagonist works as an anatomist, there is no evidence of characters with disabilities portrayed with agency or as central narrative drivers.
Strengths
- Provides a focused character study of the friction between professional duty and domestic social aspirations.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks intersectional complexity and fails to subvert traditional gender hierarchies or systemic norms.
- Shows no engagement with queer themes or non-cisnormative identities.
- Reflects significant demographic homogeneity with no evidence of multi-ethnic representation.
AI Analysis
The film is a period-specific drama that adheres to the social and narrative conventions of 1955. It centers on the interpersonal friction within a conventional marriage, focusing on individual character flaws rather than intersectional complexity. The narrative architecture relies on traditional hierarchies. The male protagonist occupies the sphere of professional labor, while the female protagonist is defined by her social ambitions and pursuit of celebrity. Ultimately, the work lacks intentional efforts to disrupt established social or identity-based structures, reflecting the demographic and social homogeneity typical of its era and region.
Similar Movies
The Chairman
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Society Doctor
1935
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Once a Doctor
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
The Tight Knot
1957
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Gardez le sourire
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Monologue
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Young Dr. Kildare
1938
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
Bedside
1934
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Il dottor Antonio
1937
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Fuhrmann Henschel
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
80,000 Suspects
1963
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.