You are here:

Jihadists

Name: Jihadists
Director: François Margolin, Lemine Ould Salem
Released: 2016
Duration: 72 min

Representation Score

2.3/10

Limited

2016

Director

François Margolin, Lemine Ould Salem

Runtime

72 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jihadists serves as a specialized sociological document that prioritizes ethnographic depth over demographic breadth. It succeeds in providing ability to act to non-Western subjects, offering a nuanced perspective that challenges traditional Anglo-centric media hierarchies. However, the film is constrained by its narrow subject matter. The focus on male-dominated extremist movements results in a significant lack of gender diversity and characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity. Ultimately, while the film excels in racial and cultural authenticity, its lack of LGBTQ+ and female perspectives limits its overall progressive diversity score.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jihadists have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses solely on the sociological study of radicalization and does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing queer experiences within this specific investigative scope.

How does Jihadists portray gender?

Limited

The narrative is heavily centered on male subjects, reflecting the demographic reality of the extremist movements. It lacks women's ability to drive the story or the subversion of gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jihadists?

Excellent

The film provides high representation for North African and Middle Eastern populations. This disrupts Western-centric lenses by centering these identities within their specific geopolitical context.

How does Jihadists represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film provides a platform for subjects to voice their own ideological perspectives. It explores the friction between religious interpretation and Western societal structures through a postmodern lens.

Does Jihadists include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film's interest lies in ideological radicalization rather than disability studies.

Present on Screen

Provides high levels of representation for North African and Middle Eastern populations.
Disrupts Western-centric media lenses by centering non-Western identities and perspectives.
Offers subjects ability to act by allowing them to voice their own ideological motivations.

Limited or Absent

Lacks women's ability to drive the story and representation within the narrative structure.
Provides no visibility for LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth experiences.
Fails to address physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the subject matter.

Official Synopsis

A documentary that takes us to the heart of jihadism in Mali

How are these scores produced? →