You are here:

Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter

Name: Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter
Director: Hollis Frampton
Released: 1972
Duration: 36 min

Representation Score

5.0/10

Fair

1972

Director

Hollis Frampton

Runtime

36 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Hollis Frampton’s work functions as a formalist disruption of traditional cinema. By replacing character-driven ability to act with structural and linguistic experimentation, the film moves away from conventional social clichés. The inclusion of Chinese phonetics provides a cross-cultural intellectual engagement that challenges Western-centric sensory experiences. This linguistic integration serves as a primary driver of the film's diversity. However, the absence of human subjects and interpersonal relationships limits the film's ability to represent specific identities. The work achieves diversity through structural omission and auditory deconstruction rather than active character portrayal.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on landscape and consciousness without character-driven plots or romantic depictions, resulting in a lack of explicit character's ability to drive the story.

How does Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter portray gender?

Fair

The work emphasizes abstract perception over human subjects through the 'eye of the mind.' It disrupts gender hierarchies by omitting traditional protagonists, maintaining a neutral stance.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter?

Fair

The soundtrack incorporates Chinese language rhythms, helping to decenter Anglo-centric auditory norms.

How does Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter represent religion and culture?

Good

The film prioritizes philosophical inquiry over religious or nationalistic dogma. It uses language as a structural element to critique Western linguistic certainty and traditional meaning.

Does Hapax Legomena V: Ordinary Matter include disability representation?

Minimal

As an experimental structuralist work focused on landscapes and linguistic patterns, there are no characters or depictions related to physical or neurodivergent identities.

Present on Screen

Incorporates non-Western linguistic structures through the use of the Wade-Giles Chinese syllabary.
Challenges Western-centric auditory norms by using language as a rhythmic, mantric soundtrack.
Disrupts conventional gender hierarchies by emphasizing abstract perception over gendered protagonists.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit character's ability to drive the story or romantic depictions necessary for higher LGBTQ+ representation.
Provides no specific character arcs to allow for active gender subversion.
Does not include depictions of physical or neurodivergent identities.

Official Synopsis

"A vision of a journey, during which the eye of the mind drives headlong through Salisbury Cloister (a monument to enclosure), Brooklyn Bridge (a monument to connection), Stonehenge (a monument to the intercourse between consciousness and LIGHT)... visiting along the way diverse meadows, barns, waters where I now live; and ending in the remembered cornfields of my childhood. The soundtrack annexes, as mantram, the Wade-Giles syllabary of the Chinese language." (H.F.)

How are these scores produced? →