You are here:
The Exorcism of Roland Doe

The Exorcism of Roland Doe

2021

Director

Tom Jennings

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The Exorcist has terrified audiences since 1973, but few know the story is true. For the first time on television, investigators expose shocking secrets about the real-life exorcism of a 13-year-old boy that inspired an iconic horror film.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film centers on a historical case involving a 13-year-old boy. There is no explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives within the primary investigation.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on investigators and historical figures. Women appear primarily in secondary roles or within a historical context, though the film challenges patriarchal religious authority.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The story remains centered on a homogeneous Western social structure. It does not prioritize racial or ethnic intersectionality, focusing instead on mid-century American religious culture.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary disrupts religious dogma by using a secular, investigative lens. It treats traditional religious responses as subjects of scrutiny rather than absolute truths.

Disability Representation

Fair

The central subject involves a boy experiencing profound psychological or neurological distress. The film attempts to examine his lived reality beyond supernatural tropes.

Strengths

  • Challenges traditional religious authority through a skeptical, investigative lens.
  • Moves beyond supernatural tropes to examine psychological and neurological distress.
  • Provides a secular deconstruction of cinematic myths and religious dogma.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or narratives within the historical investigation.
  • Features limited racial and ethnic intersectionality, focusing on a homogeneous social structure.
  • Women are primarily relegated to secondary or historical roles.

AI Analysis

The documentary prioritizes intellectual deconstruction over demographic variety. It functions as an investigative tool to challenge religious and cinematic myths rather than a showcase for diverse identities. Its strength lies in its skeptical approach to established institutions. By examining the intersection of faith and medical history, it moves away from traditional supernatural tropes toward a more secular inquiry. However, the film's narrow historical focus limits its breadth. The narrative remains largely confined to a specific mid-century Western milieu, resulting in low scores for racial and LGBTQ+ representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.