You are here:

Skyscraper

Skyscraper

Representation Score

2.0/10

Limited

1959

Director

Shirley Clarke, Willard Van Dyke, Wheaton Galentine, Irving Jacoby, D. A. Pennebaker

Runtime

22 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Skyscraper serves as a period-specific observational record of mid-century American industrialism. Its primary purpose is documenting engineering and labor rather than exploring social identity. The film mirrors the rigid hierarchies of 1959. The production lacks intentionality in disrupting traditional norms. While it provides a candid look at the era's diverse labor pool, it does not actively engage with racial, gender, or cultural representation beyond the standard realities of the time. Ultimately, the film functions as a celebration of corporate and economic growth. It adheres to the social structures of its era, prioritizing the technical achievements of the Tishman Building over social diversity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Skyscraper have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or narratives related to non-traditional gender identities.

How does Skyscraper portray gender?

Minimal

The documentary highlights a predominantly male workforce, emphasizing traditional 1950s masculine roles in physical labor. It does not depict any women's ability to drive the story or challenge traditional gender roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Skyscraper?

Limited

The film captures a workforce that reflects mid-century New York demographics. While it showcases a diverse labor pool, it does not intentionally address multiple aspects of identity.

How does Skyscraper represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative celebrates mid-century capitalist expansion and Western architectural achievements. It does not offer any critique of Western institutions or moral relativism.

Does Skyscraper include disability representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on the idealized physical strength needed for high-altitude construction. It does not represent neurodivergence or physical disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a candid, observational look at the diverse labor pool required for large-scale urban projects in mid-century New York.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of women's ability to drive the story or any challenge to traditional gender roles within the industrial setting.
  • Does not include representation of neurodivergence or physical disabilities, focusing instead on idealized physical strength.
  • Fails to explore multi-layered identities, adhering strictly to the social hierarchies of the 1950s.

Official Synopsis

Nominated for an Academy Award, this live-action short film playfully chronicles the construction of the Tishman Building at 666 Fifth Avenue in New York City.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.