
Criando ratas
2016

1987
Director
Vicente Aranda
Runtime
123 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In Spain of the 1960s, a poor family of quinquis - a nomadic ethnic group with a tradition as old as that of the gypsises of Spain but with even more obscure origins - have a nomadic life marked by poverty. The son, Eleuterio Sánchez Rodriguez, nicknamed "El Lute", steals some chickens and is condemned to six months in jail. El Lute moves to the slum outskirts of Madrid with his common law wife, Chelo, starting an itinerant life as a peddler of pots and pans and living in a quinqui shantytown. He gradually embarks upon as life of petty criminality, eventually participating in the theft of a jewelry store during which a bystander is killed.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a traditional common-law partnership between the protagonist and Chelo. It lacks explicit LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative expressions, though the itinerant domestic structure offers a minor departure from bourgeois family models.
Gender Representation
Gender roles are depicted through a gritty, survivalist lens within a marginalized community. While Chelo is a partner in the itinerant lifestyle, the narrative remains driven by the male protagonist's struggle against the state.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film excels by centering the quinqui subculture, a nomadic ethnic group in Spain. It provides agency to this historically overlooked demographic, framing their existence through systemic struggle rather than caricature.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative is deeply critical of 1960s Spanish legal and penal systems. It frames criminality as a byproduct of poverty, positioning the oppressive social structure as the primary antagonist.
Disability Representation
There is no significant evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Vicente Aranda’s drama succeeds as a piece of social realism by centering the quinqui subculture. By focusing on a nomadic ethnic group, the film disrupts homogeneous historical lenses and provides a nuanced look at systemic exclusion. The film's strength lies in its critique of institutional authority. It portrays the state as an antagonistic force that criminalizes poverty, moving the conflict away from simple moral binaries toward a study of situational ethics. However, the film lacks diversity in other areas. It does not feature explicit LGBTQ+ representation or disability-focused narratives, and the gender dynamics remain largely centered on the male protagonist's journey.

2016

1967

1959

1996

1974

1987

2017

2000

1983

1986

1970

2008
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.