You are here:
11/8/16

11/8/16

2017

NR

Director

Duane Andersen, Don Argott, Ciara Lacy, Alma Har'el, james Gonçalves, Raul Gasteazoro, Garth Donovan, Vikram Gandhi, Andrew Grace, Martha Shane, Bassam Tariq, Alison Klayman, Elaine McMillion Sheldon, Yung Chang, Petra Epperlein, Daniel Junge, Sheena M. Joyce, Michael Tucker

Runtime

104 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

U.S. citizens in more than 25 states are followed as they set out on the morning of the presidential election, throughout the course of the day, until the polls close in the evening and the results are revealed.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.2/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film provides meaningful visibility to diverse identities within the electorate. While it does not center on specific queer narratives, the inclusion of non-heteronormative individuals disrupts traditional archetypes.

Gender Representation

Fair

The documentary avoids male-dominated political tropes by presenting a balanced spectrum of agency. It highlights the intellectual and emotional agency of women navigating a high-stakes political environment.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The film excels by capturing a wide array of racial and ethnic backgrounds across 25 states. This approach effectively challenges the white-normative lens often found in mainstream political reporting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative prioritizes subjective morality and localized cultural values. It showcases how individual truths clash with nationalistic ideals, favoring a complex, multi-vocal reality over a singular narrative.

Disability Representation

Fair

The observational format limits specific focus on neurodivergence or physical disability. While there is diverse physical presence, the film lacks intentionality beyond passive participation in the electoral process.

Strengths

  • The multi-director approach creates a pluralistic, non-homogeneous view of the American electorate.
  • The film successfully disrupts traditional gender hierarchies by showcasing diverse agency.
  • It challenges white-normative political reporting through wide-lens racial and ethnic inclusion.

Areas for Improvement

  • The observational format lacks intentionality regarding the representation of neurodivergence and physical disability.
  • Queer narratives are present but lack the specific focus required to move beyond moderate visibility.

AI Analysis

11/8/16 functions as a cinematic mosaic, utilizing a decentralized, multi-director approach to capture the American socio-political landscape. By avoiding a central protagonist, the film successfully presents a fragmented and intersectional view of a nation in flux. The documentary's greatest strength is its refusal to present a homogeneous electorate. Its multi-perspective architecture allows for a pluralistic study of identity, effectively challenging traditional, singular-perspective storytelling. However, the film's observational nature results in some limitations. While it captures a broad cross-section of society, certain identities, such as those with disabilities, remain part of the background rather than being given intentional narrative focus.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.