
Intermissions
2004

2017
NRDirector
Duane Andersen, Don Argott, Ciara Lacy, Alma Har'el, james Gonçalves, Raul Gasteazoro, Garth Donovan, Vikram Gandhi, Andrew Grace, Martha Shane, Bassam Tariq, Alison Klayman, Elaine McMillion Sheldon, Yung Chang, Petra Epperlein, Daniel Junge, Sheena M. Joyce, Michael Tucker
Runtime
104 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
U.S. citizens in more than 25 states are followed as they set out on the morning of the presidential election, throughout the course of the day, until the polls close in the evening and the results are revealed.
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film provides meaningful visibility to diverse identities within the electorate. While it does not center on specific queer narratives, the inclusion of non-heteronormative individuals disrupts traditional archetypes.
Gender Representation
The documentary avoids male-dominated political tropes by presenting a balanced spectrum of agency. It highlights the intellectual and emotional agency of women navigating a high-stakes political environment.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film excels by capturing a wide array of racial and ethnic backgrounds across 25 states. This approach effectively challenges the white-normative lens often found in mainstream political reporting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative prioritizes subjective morality and localized cultural values. It showcases how individual truths clash with nationalistic ideals, favoring a complex, multi-vocal reality over a singular narrative.
Disability Representation
The observational format limits specific focus on neurodivergence or physical disability. While there is diverse physical presence, the film lacks intentionality beyond passive participation in the electoral process.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
11/8/16 functions as a cinematic mosaic, utilizing a decentralized, multi-director approach to capture the American socio-political landscape. By avoiding a central protagonist, the film successfully presents a fragmented and intersectional view of a nation in flux. The documentary's greatest strength is its refusal to present a homogeneous electorate. Its multi-perspective architecture allows for a pluralistic study of identity, effectively challenging traditional, singular-perspective storytelling. However, the film's observational nature results in some limitations. While it captures a broad cross-section of society, certain identities, such as those with disabilities, remain part of the background rather than being given intentional narrative focus.

2004

2017

2018

2021

2014

2018

2016

2017

2010

2019

2010

2002
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.