New Showbiz

You are here:
The Legend of Tarzan

The Legend of Tarzan

2016

PG-13

Director

David Yates

Runtime

109 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Tarzan, having acclimated to life in London, is called back to his former home in the jungle to investigate the activities at a mining encampment.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to conventional heteronormative structures. The central emotional arc focuses entirely on the romantic bond between John Clayton III and Jane Porter.

Gender Representation

Fair

Jane Porter is reimagined with significant agency, participating actively in the expedition. However, the narrative still relies on the protagonist’s protective role to drive much of the action.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Casting for the primary protagonists remains centered on a white, Anglo-Saxon perspective. While local characters appear, the narrative lens focuses primarily on European characters and their interactions with the environment.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film utilizes a post-colonial framework to critique the exploitative nature of 19th-century colonial capitalism. It challenges the perceived superiority of Western industrial progress by framing colonial administration as a source of moral decay.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central character arcs or plot drivers.

Strengths

  • Jane Porter is depicted with significant agency rather than as a passive figure.
  • The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of 19th-century colonial capitalism and greed.
  • The film challenges traditional 'civilization vs. wilderness' tropes through a post-colonial lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • The lead casting remains centered on a white, Anglo-Saxon perspective.
  • There is a complete lack of LGBTQ+ representation or queer subtext.
  • The narrative still relies on traditional gender dynamics regarding the protagonist's protective role.

AI Analysis

The film occupies a middle ground in its representational profile. It lacks significant LGBTQ+ representation and diverse casting in its lead roles, which keeps the demographic scores relatively low. However, the production achieves a higher score through its sophisticated thematic engagement with post-colonialism. By framing traditional Western colonial structures as inherently corrupt and exploitative, the film provides a nuanced social critique that disrupts standard adventure tropes. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual deconstruction of institutional exploitation rather than its demographic breadth.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Conan the Barbarian

Conan the Barbarian

1982

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.