You are here:

Nature of the Crime

Nature of the Crime

Representation Score

8.2/10

Excellent

2024

TV-14

Director

Ricki Stern, Jesse Sweet

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Nature of the Crime succeeds in humanizing incarcerated individuals by moving past the 'predator' cliché. By focusing on remorse and the psychological impact of the parole system, the film offers a sophisticated look at systemic institutional structures. The narrative provides significant roles to a multi-ethnic cast, allowing for a nuanced examination of how different people navigate the same legal bureaucracy. This approach prioritizes lived experience over simplified morality. However, the film's scope is narrow regarding identity. The absence of LGBTQ+ narratives and specific clinical mental health arcs limits the breadth of its representation, keeping the diversity profile centered on the intersection of race and masculinity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Nature of the Crime have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not explicitly address LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight relationships. It focuses on the intersection of age, crime, and the parole process.

How does Nature of the Crime portray gender?

Fair

The documentary centers on male subjects but challenges traditional masculine clichés. It highlights emotional vulnerability and the psychological burden of seeking redemption rather than stoic strength.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Nature of the Crime?

Good

A multi-ethnic cast provides diverse perspectives on navigating the bureaucratic parole system. The narrative explores how systemic cycles affect different individuals within the legal framework.

How does Nature of the Crime represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film critiques Western carceral institutions by framing the parole board as an overwhelming bureaucracy. It emphasizes the subjective morality of rehabilitation and systemic reform.

Does Nature of the Crime include disability representation?

Fair

While physical disabilities are not mentioned, the film explores the psychological toll of long-term imprisonment. It touches on the invisible cognitive burdens of decades in prison.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional masculine clichés by emphasizing emotional vulnerability and remorse.
  • Provides a multi-ethnic perspective on navigating complex bureaucratic systems.
  • Critiques institutional justice by focusing on the psychological toll of incarceration.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.
  • Provides limited evidence regarding specific neurodivergence or clinical mental health arcs.
  • Focuses primarily on male experiences, limiting gender diversity.

Official Synopsis

After decades in prison, Todd Scott, Chad Campbell, and Carlos Rebollo navigate the complex bureaucracy of the parole system and deal with its psychological toll. All three men, incarcerated as teens, wrestle with the weight of their crimes, questioning how they can appropriately express their deep remorse to a parole board that will determine whether they are released.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.