You are here:
Time for Revenge

Time for Revenge

1981

R

Director

Adolfo Aristarain

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Two coworkers decide to blackmail the corrupt demolition company they work for by setting up a fake accident.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit details regarding sexual orientation or gender identity. The narrative focus remains on survival and justice rather than exploring non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on two male coworkers challenging industrial hierarchies. While it subverts traditional patriarchal leadership, the primary drivers appear to be male-centric archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

As an Argentine production, the film offers a perspective outside Anglo-Saxon cinematic norms. It focuses on the working class within a Latin American socio-political landscape.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film excels in its anti-capitalist critique of corporate malfeasance. It rejects traditional legalistic morality to favor situational ethics and systemic rebellion against predatory institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence within the narrative regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Strengths

  • Strong cultural critique of capitalist entities and corporate malfeasance.
  • Provides a non-Western perspective by centering on Argentine socio-political landscapes.
  • Offers a nuanced look at identity through the lens of labor and class struggle.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • Gender representation is limited by a focus on traditional industrial hierarchies.
  • No visible engagement with disability representation or neurodivergent perspectives.

AI Analysis

Adolfo Aristarain’s thriller serves as a sharp critique of systemic corruption and institutional decay. By framing two workers as agents of disruption against a predatory demolition company, the film moves beyond simple crime tropes to examine socio-economic friction. The work's strength lies in its cultural perspective, offering a Latin American lens on class struggle and labor. It successfully deconstructs the 'rule of law' by portraying it as a tool for the powerful, favoring justice over institutional stability. However, the film's focus on industrial hierarchy and male coworkers limits its breadth in terms of gender and LGBTQ+ representation. The narrative remains primarily centered on a specific class-based struggle without explicit evidence of broader identity diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.