You are here:
The Name of the Rose

The Name of the Rose

1986

R

Director

Jean-Jacques Annaud

Runtime

130 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

14th-century Franciscan monk William of Baskerville and his young novice arrive at a conference to find that several monks have been murdered under mysterious circumstances. To solve the crimes, William must rise up against the Church's authority and fight the shadowy conspiracy of monastery monks using only his intelligence; which is considerable.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Good

The film uses queer subtext as a central driver of its mystery. Repressed same-sex intimacy acts as a catalyst for tension and systemic conflict within the monastery.

Gender Representation

Limited

A patriarchal monastic hierarchy dominates the narrative, leaving women with almost no agency. Female characters are relegated to peripheral or victimized roles, such as the peasant girl.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The casting is almost entirely homogeneous, reflecting a Western European demographic. There is no significant inclusion of non-white characters in positions of agency.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film provides a sharp critique of the Church and the Inquisition. It portrays these institutions as dogmatic and oppressive rather than moral anchors.

Disability Representation

Limited

Physical frailty and mental instability are used primarily as plot devices or markers of the era's grim reality. Characters with disabilities lack meaningful agency.

Strengths

  • Sophisticated use of queer subtext to drive the central mystery and narrative tension.
  • Effective critique of institutional dogma and the oppressive nature of the Inquisition.
  • Strong portrayal of individual inquiry and empirical reason against systemic control.

Areas for Improvement

  • Near-total absence of female agency and meaningful female roles within the plot.
  • Lack of racial and ethnic diversity, maintaining a strictly homogeneous European demographic.
  • Limited agency for characters with physical or mental disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film presents a striking dichotomy between its demographic homogeneity and its progressive intellectual themes. While it fails to provide diverse racial or gender representation, it succeeds in subverting the very institutions that enforce such rigid social structures. Its strength lies in the sophisticated handling of suppressed identities and the critique of religious hegemony. However, the historical setting results in a strictly male-dominated power structure that limits the scope of its social representation.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.